建筑技术
 
 
建筑技术
基础工程施工技术研究与应用 最新目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索
某机场自重湿陷性黄土场地地基处理试验研究
姚雪贵1, 姚志华2, 周立新3, 雷愿锋1
1.中国航空港建设第七工程总队,450000,陕西宝鸡;2.空军工程大学 机场建筑工程系,710038,西安;3.空军工程设计研究局,100068,北京
Foundation treatment of self weight collapse loess of removal airport project
YAO Xue-gui1, YAO Zhi-hua2, ZHOU Li-xin3, LEI Yuan-feng1
1. The 7th Engineering Corps of China Airport Construction, 721000, Baoji, Shanxi, China; 2. Department of Airdrome Construction Engineering, Air force engineering university, 710038, Xi’an, China; 3.Air Force Engineering Design & Research Institute, 100068, Beijing , China
 全文: PDF (0 KB)   HTML (1 KB)  输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      背景资料
摘要 为消除某机场迁建工程自重湿陷性黄土场地的湿陷性,达到减小高填方场地工后沉降的目的,选用灰(素)土挤密桩、孔内深层强夯挤密桩(DDC)及强夯法对6个场地进行试验,获得了诸多物理力学参数,分析不同方法处理的效果。结果表明灰土和素土挤密桩在消除黄土湿陷性上均能达到目标,从环保和经济角度考虑可以优先选用素土挤密桩;挤密桩和DDC桩的挤密系数基本呈现上部和下部较小,中间较大的趋势,而强夯法处理的压实系数随着深度增加逐渐减小;强夯法的压实系数基本上大于挤密桩和DDC桩的挤密系数;DDC处理区域,若干点的湿陷系数大于0.015,重要黄土地基处理工程应慎重采用该种方法;从经济和效率角度考虑,强夯法要优于挤密桩和DDC法,大面积施工中建议采用强夯法。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
姚雪贵
姚志华
周立新
雷愿锋
关键词自重湿陷性黄土   灰(素)土挤密桩   孔内深层强夯挤密桩   强夯法     
Abstract:  In order to eliminate collapsibility of self weight collapse loess of removal airport project in Yan’an and decrease sedimentation of high-fill site, some physical mechanics index of six test sites were acquired by using lime-soil (original soil) compaction pile, down-hole dynamic compaction and dynamic compaction, effectiveness of 3 kinds of foundation treatment was analyzed. The test results showed, lime-soil (original soil) can achieve the purpose of eliminating collapsibility, from an environmental and economic point, original soil compaction pile will be given the priority. Compaction coefficient of compaction pile and DDC pile basically shows that the upper and lower part of pile is small, the larger and the intermediate pile is large, while degree of compaction of the dynamic compaction decreases with the depth increasing. degree of compaction of dynamic compaction method is greater than the compaction coefficient of compaction pile and DDC pile basically. In DDC treatment area, some points are greater than 0.015, so important engineering projects should be careful using this method. From point of economy and efficiency, the dynamic compaction method is superior to the compaction pile and DDC method, the large area construction should be suggested to use dynamic compaction.
Key words:   
作者简介: 姚雪贵(1962—),男,湖南岳阳人,高级工程师,e-mail:lightbright@163.com.
引用本文:   
姚雪贵,姚志华,周立新等. 某机场自重湿陷性黄土场地地基处理试验研究[J]. 建筑技术, 2016, 47(3): 213-.
YAO Xue-gui,YAO Zhi-hua,ZHOU Li-xin et al. Foundation treatment of self weight collapse loess of removal airport project[J]. Architecture Technology, 2016, 47(3): 213-.
链接本文:  
http://www.jzjs.com/CN/     或     http://www.jzjs.com/CN/Y2016/V47/I3/213
 
没有找到本文相关图表信息
没有本文参考文献
[1] 邹仁华. 在湿陷性黄土地基加固中采用强夯法的几个问题[J]. 建筑技术, 2003, 34(3): 220-221.
?
版权所有 © 2011 建筑技术杂志社
地址:北京市广莲路1号建工大厦A座9层,邮编100055 电话:(010)68512449 (010)63928687,63928688 e-mail:jzjs@sina.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn